Friday, July 13, 2012

Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN movie review


Y Tu Mama Tambien

Starring: Maribel Verdu, Gael Garcia Bernal, Ana Lopez Mercado, Diego Luna

Running time: 106 minutes

Year: 2001

Directed By: Alfonso Cuaron

Written By: Alfonso Cuaron & Carlos Cuaron



So much can be spoken about this film. It is one of those which whilst you are watching it you are unsure what to think, and when it finishes you feel completely overwhelmed by what you have just seen. All of this and the film isn't really about anything on the surface and doesn't have any major scenes to get you on the edge of your seat. It is simply a film with fantastically written and acted characters that you care about and want to follow on their journey, which is the brilliance with this film.

The plot is fairly simple. Two Mexican teenage lads lose their girlfriends to the travelling bug, however as soon as the other halves disappear across the World the two begin partying and searching for that next sexual encounter. At a wedding, to which they both attend, they meet Tenoch's (Luna) cousin's wife. Hr name is Luisa (Verdu), she is ten years older and way out of their league. However they both work their charm and invite her to a make believe beach the following day.

The lads little fib doesn't pay off as when she realises that her husband has been sleeping with random women she takes them up on the offer, sending the three of them across the country in search of a make believe beach. Whilst on this trip tension between the friends builds as both try to sexually conquer a woman much older than them. She again calls their bluff and begins to flirt back and before you know it she is pitting them against each other. Many times through the film we see Luisa alone and upset, clearly hurt at her recent issues, but we don't fully understand this until the end when her big secret is revealed and we can see why she is like she is. It ends up being quite moving.

Like I said the film is very bare on the surface but the depths are endless. For one it shows us the contrasts within certain areas of Mexico at the time of filming. This is also highlighted by narration which is spoken over a muted backing track every time the trio move to a different area. The narrator explains to us the dangers of where they are heading or the turmoil the area has been through. As well as the narration we see this in our leading characters. Tenoch is a member of a wealthy family and has mainly been brought up by the maid. This is in contrast to Julio's (Bernal) very middle class family, who seem nonexistent in his life. In Luisa we see a woman who had potential which was extinguished due to an ill aunty she had to care for. Technically she is an orphan and had to go out to find the first job she could. Each of their contrasts are shown throughout the characters and it all means something to each of their lives.

Sex is also a massive theme in the movie. The opening shot is of one of the boys having sex with his girlfriend, and the second is of the other lad trying to have sex with his girlfriend before her Mother comes up the stairs. This is their life, and by the end of the film their sexual encounter is brought to a whole new level in a shocking final act which ultimately changes both their lives.

So much is good about this film. It is very relatable for every man and woman at the ages and with the problems of the characters. It is all believable, from the characters, to the language, to the motivations. Even the camera work is as if you are there with them in the moment. Everything about it is drawing you in and despite the lack of anything really exciting happening you are constantly hooked.

I had heard of this film before I watched it and whilst settling down to give it a view I was a little dubious but by the end I was shocked, I was moved and I was willing to watch more of these characters. Alfonso Cuaron used this film to gain the big productions in Hollywood and I'm really not surprised it worked as this film is fascinating.  

4 / 5

Next film to review: A PERFECT GETAWAY


Thursday, July 12, 2012

NEWS - Anthony Hopkins to play Methuselah in Darren Aronofsky's Noah; Philip Seymour Hoffman officially joins The Hunger Games Catching Fire; The Dark Knight Rises soundtrack.

This week's news gives us information on casting for two future projects, both anticipated in their own way. We also have some more news and viral marketing from the biggest film of the year which is released next weekend.



Anthony Hopkins to play Methuselah in Darren Aronofsky's Noah


The first bit of casting news comes from a project that has been in the pipeline for quite some time. Many have been linked with the title role, which is obviously the story of Noah and his ark, but now we have a great piece of casting in that Anthony Hopkins has landed the role of Methuselah. Now not really knowing the full story of Noah I'm not so sure what this role entails but most films starring Hopkins do turn out great. More on this film to come in the next year.

P.S Russell Crowe is to play Noah!



Philip Seymour Hoffman officially joins The Hunger Games: Catching Fire


Another piece of casting news is that Philip Seymour Hoffman has joined the sequel to The Hunger Games. He is to play Plutarch Heavensbee who is the new game maker after the disappearance of the former one. This news has been rumoured for quite some time but has now officially been confirmed. This is another great piece of casting news and definitely makes The Hunger Games a more serious franchise now that it is attracting a star of his calibre.








The Dark Knight Rises soundtrack


Movie news isn't quite the same without something to do with the most anticipated movie of 2012. The soundtrack for the film has been released in its entirety online, perhaps check out Empire or Total Film to listen, and it is brilliant. Hans Zimmer never fails to send you through the emotions whilst listening to his scores and this is no different. I began to listen but had to stop due to sheer excitement and also the worry of guessing what I think might be happening at this time in the film. Search the web and I'm sure you can find it to listen to.





THE QUIET AMERICAN movie review


The Quiet American

Starring: Michael Caine, Brendan Fraser, Do Thi Hai Yen, Rade Serbedzija

Running time: 101 minutes

Year: 2002

Directed By: Phillip Noyce

Written By: Christopher Hampton & Robert Schenkkan


When I was at college I had to read the Graham Greene novel The Quiet American and then write an essay regarding colonialism within the literature. Due to this I despised the book, not because the story or writing weren't good but because I had to do an essay on something that really didn't interest me. Years later I have decided to watch the film version of that novel and I have to say it was much better than I remember. Like I said the book wasn't bad but after watching this film, which I thought was great, I am considering buying the book and re-reading it.

The film is kept quite close to the book; which is good news for all of those who have read it. The story follows Thomas Fowler (Caine) who is an English journalist in Vietnam due to the war between the French colonialist and the communists of Vietnam. Since being there he has met a young Vietnamese woman who he can't marry due to still being married to a Catholic woman refusing a divorce. He really believes that he loves this woman despite the fact he knows most of these women are with wealthier older men to get themselves out of the country. Fowler's life begins to change though when he meets Alden Pyle (Fraser), an American medical worker who has been sent in to aid the Vietnamese. Although they become good friends, Pyle falls in love with Fowler's girl and as this is 1950's Vietnam he believes he should be able to declare his love and let her decide. Fowler then has to do all he can to keep his girl from a man with many more prospects than him. All of this is set in the beginning of the Vietnamese war and highlights a possible way to how the Americans became involved, which also ties in with this love triangle.

Don't be fooled into thinking this is a love story. It may be at heart a love story but surrounding it around the war makes all the difference. There are plenty of political theories and themes' running through it and the love story is only really one half of the entire plot but the driving force behind it all.

Caine and Fraser are brilliant in this film. Their chemistry is spot on and after reading the book these actors are exactly how you would expect them to be, they definitely done their homework. Other members of the cast also portray their roles well but it is the two leads who steal it. Caine seems to breeze through it with ease with it being a simple role for him, so most praise has to go to Fraser who has proved that he isn't just a comic actor and can take serious roles seriously. Both actors play their characters with hidden depth that seeps through as the story goes on, and we can clearly see a change in both their personalities by the end of the film.

The setting is also beautiful. The cities of Vietnam look great despite war torn, and the graininess of the cinematography also adds to this. The war scenes are filmed well and they add to the depth of conflict and desperation which is shown throughout. War may be happening but our leads are more worried that love will keep them alive.

The film kept me gripped till the end, and the final twenty minutes is intense when we finally understand what is happening. The music adds to this tension and the fast pace of the build up. This final act ironed out a few negatives that I had with the film and cleared them from view. One of these was that the beginning felt a little disjointed and expositional but the final act made me forget all about it. This was a film that I am surprised to have liked and I recommend it to those of you out their interested in this kind of plot line. Actually I recommend it to anyone who likes Michael Caine, and that must be everybody. Also don't be put off by the casting of Brendan Fraser, he is actually really good.

4 / 5

Next film to review: Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN


Wednesday, July 11, 2012

QUESTION - Who is your favourite superhero?

With The Amazing Spider-man just being released, The Dark Knight Rises being released in two weeks, the build up towards Iron Man 3 and Man Of Steel, and the game changing Avengers Assemble I want to ask you all now; who is your favourite superhero? I will list 5 below, who are the main 5 I think of, but please feel free to add more in the comments as I'm sure there are many out there with a lot of love.




1. BATMAN - The caped crusader with the alter ego of a multi billionaire who can buy anything he wants to aid his pursuit on ridding Gotham city of any sort of crime.












2. CAPTAIN AMERICA - The super soldier transformed via a serum which aided America in winning the war, hailing Steve Rodgers as the ultimate soldier which all countries want.











3. IRON MAN - Tony Stark, another multi billionaire, is also a weapons builder and builds himself an iron suit which he wears when preventing any villain from threatening the world.











4. SPIDER-MAN - Peter Parker is the web slinger who is transformed into a human spider after being bitten by a super genetic one. Web throwing and spider sensing his way around New York, Spider-man does all he can to protect civilians and his love interest Mary Jane.










5. SUPERMAN - An alien like human with super human powers lands on Earth and hides himself behind alter ego Clark Kent, whilst he changes in telephone booths to stop anyone hell bent on causing destruction. All of this whilst falling for Lois Lane.










There are 5 top superheros who many will love but I'm sure there are more others love. I also forgot to mention another great superhero movie released last year; X Men First Class, a film involving many superheros. Anyway let me know in the comments below who is your favourite.






Tuesday, July 10, 2012

New on DVD this week: 21 Jump Street

Only a couple of films are released on DVD this week but I'm pretty sure one of them will take many people's fancy. It is a film that half way through the year is placed fourth in my top 10 of the year so far, so if you are a fan of this website than it should be the film you rent this week. The other is one I haven't seen yet but does star some great actors, however I definitely think you should all have a look at the film that is currently firmly placed in my top 10 of 2012 so far.




Recommended
21 JUMP STREET - Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill star in this film version of an 80's television show. They play two dreadful cops who are sent undercover into a school to uncover a drugs ring amongst the pupils. When they enter the school though they struggle to understand the change in high school dynamics since they were there themselves.

21 Jump Street trailer







RAMPART - Woody Harrelson plays a cop who is struggling to provide for his family and for himself. That is until a potential opportunity comes along but it could mean breaking the one thing he has sworn to protect.


Rampart trailer

Monday, July 9, 2012

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN - Amazing certainly isn't the word.

The Amazing Spider-man was the second film we saw this weekend. Before it even began I knew it was going to struggle to make an impact on an already flooded superhero market. You've only got to look at Avengers Assemble and The Dark Knight Rises to realise that this will be the third best superhero film of the year. It also doesn't help that only a decade ago Sam Raimi's Spiderman was released, which was actually pretty good. This is my issue with reboots. Only reboot if you are going to make the film better than the last version. Sadly here The Amazing Spider-man is one of those that fails to match up to the original, and ultimately doesn't justify the money and point of rebooting.

For starters we have seen it all before. If you saw the Tobey Maguire version then the opening hour of this film is pointless. As I have seen it I found this opening actually pretty boring. All it was was the same idea just told in a different way, and I actually think the previous version was better. The second half does get slightly better but it is just Spider-man fighting against a different villain in the same way he normally does. It is practically a remake as opposed to a reboot. It boasts that it will tell the untold story but it really doesn't. It is supposed to tell us about the disappearance of his parents, but after twenty minutes this thread disappears and doesn't get resolved. What was the point of it? The only thing keeping it original has been scrapped in the first act. Basically it turns into a generic Spiderman origin story.




This time we are introduced to Dr Curt Connors, who eventually turns into the Lizard. If this was supposed to be a more realistic take on the superhero, in such a way that Batman Begins was for the Batman franchise, than they failed due to the decision with which the villain to use. If Rhys Ifans grew scaly skin due to a, typically, bodged experiment then it may have been believable, but instead he turns into a miniature Godzilla which looks ridiculous. They make the villain look like this but try to make Spidey's web throwing more realistic by having them produced by a device on his wrist. Why do this? It also never explains how Peter Parker is that clever to invent something like that as they never really show him being a geek.




Peter not being much of a geek was an issue for me. Maguire's version made Spiderman look even more impressive as it was the bullied kid saving the day. Here Garfield's Parker is too cocky to have the same character arc. I'm not sure whether this is the direction or the acting but neither his Parker or Spiderman is better than Maguire's. The script probably doesn't help but all of Peter Parker's relationships are glossed over. There isn't much of a connection with Gwen Stacey, Uncle Ben, Aunt May, Curt Connors or Captain Stacey. All of these relationships were explored in the last film, including a best mate and a certain newspaper mogul who is sadly missing from this film.

The film is a bit of a pointless entity really. It has its moments but all the darkness the trailer provided is sadly missing. The previous outings have all been better and it makes you wonder why they felt the need to redo it. Garfield isn't any better than Maguire, and looks way to old. Dunst and Stone play different characters but the love interest all the same and Dunst and Maguire's relationship was much more believable. It was also missing a best friend for Peter to bounce off as Maguire and James Franco's relationship in the previous trilogy was a constant thread which paid off. This film was just lacking in so many areas. We also get very little information into how quickly Curt Connors turns bad and as to what Irrfan Khan's character is really about. All in all a disappointing movie that should never have been done. At least Sam Raimi will be smiling.

Pros: Webb has tried hard and some of the action scenes are impressive.

Cons: It seems really unneeded. Previous films were much better.

6 / 10

Top 10 of 2012 so far:


1. The Hunger Games     8 / 10
2. Snow White And The Huntsman     8 / 10
3. Avengers Assemble     7.5 / 10
4. 21 Jump Street     7.5 / 10
5. Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol     7 / 10
6. The Grey     7 / 10
7. Prometheus     6.5 / 10
8. The Amazing Spider-man     6 / 10
9. American Reunion     6 / 10
10. Safe House     6 / 10





ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER - Let's hope this isn't actually true.

Apologise for this review being a week late but Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter was the film we missed out a couple of weeks back so we saw this week as well as this week's choice of film. I'm going to start with Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter and tell you what I thought of the film with possibly the most intriguing title of a film for years. This must have been the easiest pitch ever to a studio as four words technically sold it. However I'm sure the concept sounded better when in the meeting room then the film I watched in the dark room.

The film does get off to a strong start. The first ten minutes I found quite interesting and exciting. What we see is a young Mr Lincoln who fails to act when his Mother is killed by his Father's boss. Years later he has finally built up the courage to gain revenge and when he pulls the trigger he realises that his Father's boss is in fact a vampire. He is saved from certain death by a vampire hunter who instantly trains Mr Lincoln to be one himself. This is instantly where the film dips completely. Up to this point I was interested but in a blink of an eye the movie lost me. For starters the training scenes are slightly ridiculous with Dominic Cooper needing very little persuasion to become Lincoln's trainer. It was all a bit forced and rushed in this scene. This however does happen in several other scenes where implausibility's are glossed over and something happens which feels rushed. This whole training sequence is exactly that and it is a poor follow on from a good start.

Another time this happens is with his relationship with Mary Todd. One point he tells her he likes her despite her fiancee and in the next breath he is proposing. Where the hell did her fiancee go? This was a prime example of a rushed love interest with all relationship development completely forgotten about. To me this is a major problem because I didn't care in the slightest about their relationship. Later we also see Anthony Mackie enter the fray, again with much of their relationship and character development totally glazed over. It made an unbelievable movie, due to the title and concept, even more unbelievable with the parts which should have been realistic. I was willing to suspend my belief for the vampire side of the story but I just couldn't see through the poor relationship development. It was like this film was simply about the effects and the unusual concept.

This moves me on to the special effects, which just look computer game-ish throughout. One sequence with a fight whilst walking across horseback could be an exciting idea but it is pulled off as if I was playing a game on the Playstation 3: another problem which took my interest away from the film. There was also too much slow motion shots. So much that they possibly added a good few minutes to the running time because of this. The director here is the same as Wanted and the effects are very similar, so if the effects in Wanted frustrated you then this will even more so.

I'm going to finish with the lead actor Benjamin Walker, the unknown cast as the historical figure. I will give him his dues, he isn't bad in the role the problem is he just doesn't look the part. When he swings axes round in his hands, and is labelled 'crazy' it just doesn't look right. He is actually better when he plays the older Lincoln, meaning he is wearing prosthetic make-up. Then again I also hear that Tom Hardy was offered the role first, which would have possibly been a worse casting choice. I also haven't mentioned the main baddie of the film, played by Rufus Sewell. I have probably mentioned him as much here as he is seen in the film because it really isn't much and he really isn't that good. The villain is completely underwritten and is a pointless addition to the film. Basically what I'm trying to say is this is a poor film. Nothing is ever any better than average and is really a great title for a poor movie.

Pros: Interesting title. First ten minutes.

Cons: Script, characters, special effects, acting.

4 / 10

Top 10 of 2012 so far:


1. The Hunger Games     8 / 10
2. Snow White And The Huntsman     8 / 10
3. Avengers Assemble     7.5 / 10
4. 21 Jump Street     7.5 / 10
5. Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol     7 / 10
6. The Grey     7 / 10
7. Prometheus     6.5 / 10
8. American Reunion     6 / 10
9. Safe House     6 / 10
10. The Five-Year Engagement     6 / 10